Head 115 CT Darwish

Head 115 CT Darwish
115 g
head-heavy
  • Head size 499 cm²
  • Balance point 383 mm
  • Length 686 mm
  • Factory string name Evolution Pro
  • String pattern 12 x 17 (mains x crosses)
  • Factory grip name UltraTac

Pros

The Head 115 CT Darwish vs other Best overall squash rackets

Head size Large head Help
499 cm²
String density for power Excellent string density for power Help
Lower density: better power
Head-heavy balance Very head-heavy Help
Centre of mass closer to the head
Weight Very light Help
115 g

Cons

The Head 115 CT Darwish vs other Best overall squash rackets

Beginner racket weight Very light for beginners Help
Requires more player strength to generate power
Neutral balance Very unbalanced Help
Centre of mass not at midpoint of length
Doubles racket weight Somewhat light for doubles Help
Less stable against heavier doubles ball
String density for control Very poor string density for control Help
Higher density: better control

Specifications

Weight & balance

Light-weight
Help
115 g
unique unique
Beginner racket weight
Help
115 g
below average below average
Doubles racket weight
Help
115 g
below average below average
Racket balance
Help
head-heavy
Head-heavy balance
Help
balance 40 mm toward head
above average above average
Head-light balance
Help
Unknown

Form factor

Length
Help
686 mm
Head size
Help
499 cm²
above average above average
Teardrop shape
Help
Yes
above average above average
Minimum beam width
Help
20 mm
Maximum beam width
Help
Unknown

Factory strings and grip

Factory string name
Help
Evolution Pro
String pattern
Help
12 x 17 (mains x crosses)
String density for control
Help
0.409 "strings²"/cm²
below average below average
String density for power
Help
0.409 "strings²"/cm²
unique unique
Factory grip name
Help
UltraTac

DiscussionWhat do you think about the Head 115 CT Darwish squash racket?

Speech is free, but discussion at SquashHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of this racket here, and discuss feedback for SquashHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments